The EFF has approached the court to challenge the decision to rescind a recommendation made by former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's Section 89 Committee. According to SABC Politics, the party is asking that the decision to rescind the recommendation be declared unlawful and set aside. The Section 89 process relates to parliamentary mechanisms for considering the removal of a sitting head of state. Further details of the case, including the court's response or the merits of the EFF's arguments, were not disclosed in the available report.

The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and the Democratic Alliance (DA) have condemned National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza's choice not to contest President Cyril Ramaphosa's legal attempt to halt impeachment proceedings against him. This decision has sparked criticism from both political parties, highlighting divisions in the response to the impeachment process.

The Impeachment Committee has set a deadline of July 10, 2026, for political parties to submit their recommendations for senior counsel to lead evidence, as President Cyril Ramaphosa faces ongoing legal challenges. This decision is part of the committee's proceedings amid the impeachment process.

The impeachment committee investigating South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has labeled evidence leader Didiza as 'dishonest' during discussions about the terms of reference for the Section 89 inquiry. This inquiry will examine the circumstances surrounding the theft of US dollars from Ramaphosa's farm, as reported by The Citizen.

Julius Malema has criticized Thoko Didiza for her management of the impeachment interdict, describing her as 'highly conflicted.' The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is calling for a change in oversight responsibilities to be transferred to the Deputy Speaker's office, reflecting the party's dissatisfaction with Didiza's actions, according to IOL.

National Assembly speaker Thoko Didiza has faced criticism for her choice not to challenge President Cyril Ramaphosa's legal attempt to halt parliamentary impeachment proceedings against him. This decision has drawn backlash from various political parties, who argue that it undermines the accountability process.