The Democratic Alliance's internal tensions have sparked discussions about corruption, lobbying, and political influence in South Africa. This situation suggests that corruption is not confined to any single political party but arises wherever power, business interests, and inadequate institutional safeguards intersect. As the DA shifts from opposition to governance, it encounters similar structural challenges faced by past administrations, highlighting the necessity for enhanced transparency, lobbying regulations, and internal accountability.

According to TimesLIVE, President Ramaphosa's decision to dismiss Tolashe from the cabinet was seen as appropriate; however, the appointment of Dina Pule, who has a controversial history, as the new social development minister has raised concerns. Critics suggest that this position is being used to reward members of the women's league rather than prioritizing qualifications.

Julius Malema has criticized Thoko Didiza for her management of the impeachment interdict, describing her as 'highly conflicted.' The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is calling for a change in oversight responsibilities to be transferred to the Deputy Speaker's office, reflecting the party's dissatisfaction with Didiza's actions, according to IOL.

The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and the Democratic Alliance (DA) have condemned National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza's choice not to contest President Cyril Ramaphosa's legal attempt to halt impeachment proceedings against him. This decision has sparked criticism from both political parties, highlighting divisions in the response to the impeachment process.

Mkhwanazi has addressed allegations concerning his involvement in systemic criminality and corruption within the EMPD, including issues related to fake police clearances, fraudulent badges, and a R14 million stolen gems heist, during the Madlanga commission hearings.

Mkhwanazi has acknowledged that the clearance certificate for Cat Matlala was fraudulent and has criticized the Madlanga commission for what he describes as selective scrutiny. He expressed concerns over the impact of this situation on his reputation, referring to it as a form of character assassination.