Geordin Hill-Lewis has publicly condemned xenophobia and urged authorities to take action to protect immigrants who are facing hostility from protesters. His statements highlight the need for safeguarding the rights and safety of immigrant communities in the face of rising tensions.

As the June 30 anti-immigration protests approach, foreign nationals and community leaders in Cape Town express concerns for their safety, urging for calm amidst rising tensions. Law enforcement agencies are preparing for possible unrest, highlighting the anxiety within the community, according to IOL.

Kenya is tightening immigration rules for foreigners as authorities step up scrutiny of non-citizens living and working in the country. According to NTV Uganda, the move has raised concern among expatriates, migrant workers and businesses that depend on foreign talent. Kenyan officials, however, argue that immigration laws must be respected and that job opportunities should be protected for citizens. The crackdown signals a stricter enforcement approach toward foreign residents and workers.

A South African premier has claimed that 'untrustworthy' officials leaked information about a planned raid targeting illegal workers, according to the Sowetan. Employees who were released from work reportedly said their bosses had been informed in advance of the crackdown, undermining the operation. The allegations raise concerns about internal leaks within government structures and the effectiveness of enforcement efforts aimed at undocumented workers. The report does not specify which province's premier made the claims or the outcome of the raid.

Cape Town mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis has issued a warning against anti-immigrant violence, emphasizing the need for the police and the broader criminal justice system to enforce the law effectively. His remarks come amid rising tensions related to immigration issues in the city.

A Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) adjudicator has declared a trustee's refusal to allow a homeowner to install a gate as void. The homeowner argued that the trustees' resolutions unreasonably interfered with their rights as an individual owner or occupier.