
The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), an Islamic human rights organization, criticized the appellate court's recent ruling on hijab, labeling it a "travesty of justice" and a "forced abortion in the temple of justice." This statement was released by the group's executive director on July 4, 2026, following the court's decision made on July 1.
AI summary. Verify with the original source.
Read full story at Leadership (NG) ↗
Listen
Unlock audio summaries, audio summaries, AI chat, Wikipedia facts, and ad-free reading.
$3.99 / month · cancel anytime
Go PremiumBackground facts
Unlock wikipedia facts, audio summaries, AI chat, Wikipedia facts, and ad-free reading.
$3.99 / month · cancel anytime
Go PremiumSimilar stories

The Muslim Public Affairs Centre (MPAC) has criticized the Court of Appeal in Ibadan for overturning a previous ruling that affirmed the right of female Muslim students to wear hijab. This decision, made by a three-member panel, was announced on Friday and nullifies the earlier judgement from May 22, 2024, which had supported the students' religious rights.
Daily Trust·July 4, 2026 at 12:55 PM
The Court of Appeal in Ibadan, Oyo State, has overturned a previous High Court ruling that permitted female Muslim students to wear hijabs at the University of Ibadan International School. In a split decision of two to one, judges Biobele Georgewill and K.I. Amadi ruled that the UI International School is a private institution, impacting the hijab policy for its students.
Information Nigeria·July 4, 2026 at 6:27 AM
The Supreme Court has overturned an order from the Appeal Court that had authorized the confiscation of an oil vessel owned by General Hydrocarbon. The court determined that both the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction over the case, as it pertains to an admiralty dispute, according to Premium Times Business.
Premium Times Business·July 3, 2026 at 4:18 PM
Judicial analysts have expressed concern over recent incongruous decisions and perceived misconduct in the courts, suggesting that an urgent intervention by the National Judicial Council is necessary, according to ThisDay Live.
ThisDay Live·July 5, 2026 at 1:45 AM
The High Court has ruled that a provision in the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, which allowed a state committee to block websites without court approval, is unconstitutional. The court found that this provision infringes on constitutional rights related to freedom of religion, expression, and media freedom, granting excessive censorship powers to an administrative body without adequate safeguards.
Nairobi Wire·July 3, 2026 at 3:46 AM
Kenya’s High Court has ruled that several key provisions of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act, 2025 are unconstitutional, a decision that has been positively received by digital rights organizations. The ruling was delivered by Justice Patricia Nyaundi at the High Court in Milimani, following a petition filed by the Kenya Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ Kenya) and ARTICLE 19.
TechTrends KE·July 2, 2026 at 10:17 AM